NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs ATI FireGL V8600
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q and ATI FireGL V8600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 74% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 688 MHz
- 9418.7x more texture fill rate: 103.7 GTexel/s vs 11.01 GTexel / s
- 3.2x more pipelines: 1024 vs 320
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 80 nm
- 4x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 159 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 15% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) vs 1736 MHz
- 8.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6871 vs 839
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 14 May 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 688 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 103.7 GTexel/s vs 11.01 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 320 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 80 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 159 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) vs 1736 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6871 vs 839 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FireGL V8600
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 406 vs 405 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
GPU 2: ATI FireGL V8600
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q | ATI FireGL V8600 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7682 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7682 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3703 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3703 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41046 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 405 | 406 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6871 | 839 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q | ATI FireGL V8600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | TeraScale |
| Code name | TU117 | R600 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 14 May 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 395 | 394 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,899 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1200 MHz | 688 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 80 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 103.7 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.636 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.318 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 320 |
| Pixel fill rate | 51.84 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 103.7 GTexel/s | 11.01 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 159 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 720 million |
| Floating-point performance | 440.3 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Width | IGP | |
| Length | 254 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 10.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 111.1 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 512 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) | 1736 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR4 |
