NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs AMD FirePro W8100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q and AMD FirePro W8100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • Around 46% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 824 MHz
  • 786.8x more texture fill rate: 103.7 GTexel/s vs 131.8 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
  • 5.5x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 220 Watt
  • Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7682 vs 5494
  • Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7682 vs 5494
  • Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41315 vs 34705
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 23 June 2014
Core clock speed 1200 MHz vs 824 MHz
Texture fill rate 103.7 GTexel/s vs 131.8 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 40 Watt vs 220 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 7682 vs 5494
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 7682 vs 5494
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3703 vs 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3703 vs 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356 vs 3349
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356 vs 3349
Geekbench - OpenCL 41315 vs 34705

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W8100

  • 2.5x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1024
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
  • 2.5x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)
  • Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 717 vs 429
  • Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7279 vs 6927
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 2560 vs 1024
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed 5000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 717 vs 429
PassMark - G3D Mark 7279 vs 6927

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W8100

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
7682
5494
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
7682
5494
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3703
3699
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3703
3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3356
3349
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3356
3349
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
41315
34705
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
429
717
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
6927
7279
Name NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q AMD FirePro W8100
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 7682 5494
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 7682 5494
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3703 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3703 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356 3349
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356 3349
Geekbench - OpenCL 41315 34705
PassMark - G2D Mark 429 717
PassMark - G3D Mark 6927 7279
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 93.339
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2333.922
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 8.816
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 112.45
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 440.107

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q AMD FirePro W8100

Essentials

Architecture Turing GCN 2.0
Code name TU117 Hawaii
Launch date 27 May 2019 23 June 2014
Place in performance rating 381 385
Type Laptop Workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1620 MHz
Core clock speed 1200 MHz 824 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 103.7 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 6.636 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 3.318 TFLOPS
Pipelines 1024 2560
Pixel fill rate 51.84 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 103.7 GTexel/s 131.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 40 Watt 220 Watt
Transistor count 4700 million 6,200 million
Floating-point performance 4,219 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI
DisplayPort count 4
Dual-link DVI support
HD сomponent video output
StereoOutput3D

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 2x 6-pin
Width IGP
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Form factor Full Height / Full Length
Length 279 mm

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 128.0 GB/s 320 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 bit 512 Bit
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) 5000 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5