NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs AMD FirePro W8100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q and AMD FirePro W8100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q

AMD FirePro W8100

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
Around 46% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 824 MHz
786.8x more texture fill rate: 103.7 GTexel/s vs 131.8 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
5.5x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 220 Watt
Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7682 vs 5494
Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7682 vs 5494
Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41287 vs 34705

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 23 June 2014
Core clock speed	1200 MHz vs 824 MHz
Texture fill rate	103.7 GTexel/s vs 131.8 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt vs 220 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	7682 vs 5494
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	7682 vs 5494
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3703 vs 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3703 vs 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356 vs 3349
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356 vs 3349
Geekbench - OpenCL	41287 vs 34705

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W8100

2.5x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1024
2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
2.5x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)
Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 727 vs 419
Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7333 vs 6896

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	2560 vs 1024
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	727 vs 419
PassMark - G3D Mark	7333 vs 6896

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W8100

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7682

5494

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7682

5494

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3703

3699

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3703

3699

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

3349

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

3349

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

41287

34705

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

419

727

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

6896

7333

Name	NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q	AMD FirePro W8100
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	7682	5494
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	7682	5494
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3703	3699
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3703	3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356	3349
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356	3349
Geekbench - OpenCL	41287	34705
PassMark - G2D Mark	419	727
PassMark - G3D Mark	6896	7333
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		93.339
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		2333.922
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		8.816
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		112.45
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		440.107

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q	AMD FirePro W8100
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	GCN 2.0
Code name	TU117	Hawaii
Launch date	27 May 2019	23 June 2014
Place in performance rating	391	389
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1620 MHz
Core clock speed	1200 MHz	824 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	103.7 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	6.636 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	3.318 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1024	2560
Pixel fill rate	51.84 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	103.7 GTexel/s	131.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt	220 Watt
Transistor count	4700 million	6,200 million
Floating-point performance		4,219 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI
DisplayPort count		4
Dual-link DVI support
HD сomponent video output
StereoOutput3D
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	2x 6-pin
Width	IGP
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Form factor		Full Height / Full Length
Length		279 mm
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	128.0 GB/s	320 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	512 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)	5000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5