NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
Around 37% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 875 MHz
Around 75% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 928 MHz
493.8x more texture fill rate: 103.7 GTexel/s vs 210 billion / sec
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
6.3x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 250 Watt
Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
285.7x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) vs 7.0 GB/s
Around 46% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41260 vs 28344

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 7 November 2013
Core clock speed	1200 MHz vs 875 MHz
Boost clock speed	1620 MHz vs 928 MHz
Texture fill rate	103.7 GTexel/s vs 210 billion / sec
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt vs 250 Watt
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 3 GB
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) vs 7.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3703 vs 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3703 vs 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356 vs 3342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356 vs 3342
Geekbench - OpenCL	41260 vs 28344

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

2.8x more pipelines: 2880 vs 1024
Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10021 vs 7682
Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10021 vs 7682
Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 635 vs 413
Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9510 vs 6899

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	2880 vs 1024
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	10021 vs 7682
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	10021 vs 7682
PassMark - G2D Mark	635 vs 413
PassMark - G3D Mark	9510 vs 6899

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7682

10021

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7682

10021

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3703

3699

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3703

3699

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

3342

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

3342

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

41260

28344

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

413

635

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

6899

9510

Name	NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	7682	10021
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	7682	10021
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3703	3699
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3703	3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356	3342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356	3342
Geekbench - OpenCL	41260	28344
PassMark - G2D Mark	413	635
PassMark - G3D Mark	6899	9510
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		75.429
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		2001.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		6.854
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		58.067
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		182.11
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		3390

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Kepler
Code name	TU117	GK110B
Launch date	27 May 2019	7 November 2013
Place in performance rating	402	399
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$699
Price now		$749.99
Value for money (0-100)		14.80
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1620 MHz	928 MHz
Core clock speed	1200 MHz	875 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	103.7 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	6.636 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	3.318 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1024	2880
Pixel fill rate	51.84 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	103.7 GTexel/s	210 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt	250 Watt
Transistor count	4700 million	7,080 million
CUDA cores		2880
Floating-point performance		5,345 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI...
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	One 8-pin and one 6-pin
Width	IGP
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length		10.5" (26.7 cm)
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (11_1)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	3 GB
Memory bandwidth	128.0 GB/s	336 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)	7.0 GB/s
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GPU Boost
SLI
TXAA