NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
  • Around 37% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 875 MHz
  • Around 75% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 928 MHz
  • 493.8x more texture fill rate: 103.7 GTexel/s vs 210 billion / sec
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
  • 6.3x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
  • 285.7x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) vs 7.0 GB/s
  • 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 40709 vs 20353
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 7 November 2013
Core clock speed 1200 MHz vs 875 MHz
Boost clock speed 1620 MHz vs 928 MHz
Texture fill rate 103.7 GTexel/s vs 210 billion / sec
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 40 Watt vs 250 Watt
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 3 GB
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) vs 7.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3713 vs 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3713 vs 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 vs 3342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 vs 3342
Geekbench - OpenCL 40709 vs 20353

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

  • 2.8x more pipelines: 2880 vs 1024
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10021 vs 9720
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10021 vs 9720
  • Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 622 vs 435
  • Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9257 vs 7219
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 2880 vs 1024
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 10021 vs 9720
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 10021 vs 9720
PassMark - G2D Mark 622 vs 435
PassMark - G3D Mark 9257 vs 7219

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9720
10021
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9720
10021
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3713
3699
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3713
3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
3342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
3342
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
40709
20353
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
435
622
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
7219
9257
Name NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9720 10021
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9720 10021
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3713 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3713 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 3342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 3342
Geekbench - OpenCL 40709 20353
PassMark - G2D Mark 435 622
PassMark - G3D Mark 7219 9257
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 75.429
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2001.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 6.854
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 58.067
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 182.11
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3404

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Essentials

Architecture Turing Kepler
Code name TU117 GK110B
Launch date 27 May 2019 7 November 2013
Place in performance rating 207 232
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $699
Price now $749.99
Value for money (0-100) 14.80

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1620 MHz 928 MHz
Core clock speed 1200 MHz 875 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 103.7 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 6.636 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 3.318 TFLOPS
Pipelines 1024 2880
Pixel fill rate 51.84 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 103.7 GTexel/s 210 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 40 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 4700 million 7,080 million
CUDA cores 2880
Floating-point performance 5,345 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI...
Audio input for HDMI Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None One 8-pin and one 6-pin
Width IGP
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length 10.5" (26.7 cm)

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (11_1)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.4
Shader Model 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 3 GB
Memory bandwidth 128.0 GB/s 336 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) 7.0 GB/s
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GPU Boost
SLI
TXAA