NVIDIA RSX Reality Synthesizer vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RSX Reality Synthesizer and NVIDIA Quadro 2000D videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RSX Reality Synthesizer
- Videocard is newer: launch date 0 year(s) 11 month(s) later
| Launch date | 4 October 2012 vs 5 October 2011 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 625 MHz vs 550 MHz
- Around 52% higher texture fill rate: 20 GTexel / s vs 13.2 GTexel / s
- Around 29% lower typical power consumption: 62 Watt vs 80 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
- Around 86% higher memory clock speed: 2600 MHz vs 1400 MHz
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz vs 550 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 20 GTexel / s vs 13.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 62 Watt vs 80 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 256 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RSX Reality Synthesizer
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
| Name | NVIDIA RSX Reality Synthesizer | NVIDIA Quadro 2000D |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 976 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3930 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.122 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 320.57 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.67 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.168 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1453 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3447 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1453 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3447 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RSX Reality Synthesizer | NVIDIA Quadro 2000D | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Curie | Fermi |
| Code name | RSX-CXD5302 | GF106 |
| Launch date | 4 October 2012 | 5 October 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 1135 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
| Price now | $209 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 7.27 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.2 GTexel / s | 20 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 62 Watt |
| Transistor count | 302 million | 1,170 million |
| Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 192 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 178 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | N / A | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | ES 1.1 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 22.4 GB / s | 41.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RSX Reality Synthesizer with others
NVIDIARSX Reality Synthesizer vs
AMDRadeon HD 7540D IGP
NVIDIARSX Reality Synthesizer vs
AMDRadeon HD 7480D IGP
NVIDIARSX Reality Synthesizer vs
AMDRadeon HD 7400G IGP
