NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon RX 580
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation and AMD Radeon RX 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
- Around 30% higher core clock speed: 1635 MHz vs 1257 MHz
- Around 58% higher boost clock speed: 2115 MHz vs 1340 MHz
- Around 5% higher texture fill rate: 203.0 GTexel/s vs 192.96 GTexel/s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2304
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 14 nm
- 3.7x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 185 Watt
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1113 vs 767
- Around 97% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17402 vs 8827
- 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 79941 vs 39028
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1635 MHz vs 1257 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2115 MHz vs 1340 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 203.0 GTexel/s vs 192.96 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 3072 vs 2304 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 185 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1113 vs 767 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 17402 vs 8827 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 79941 vs 39028 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 580
- 4x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation | AMD Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1113 | 767 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 17402 | 8827 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 79941 | 39028 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 116.142 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1022.932 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.235 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 84.034 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.721 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11281 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11281 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1005 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation | AMD Radeon RX 580 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | AD107 | Polaris 20 |
| Place in performance rating | 50 | 341 |
| Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
| Price now | $169.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 76.21 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2115 MHz | 1340 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1635 MHz | 1257 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 67.68 GPixel/s | 42.88 GP/s |
| Texture fill rate | 203.0 GTexel/s | 192.96 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 185 Watt |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Floating-point performance | 6.2 TFLOPs | |
| Render output units | 32 | |
| Stream Processors | 2304 | |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Transistor count | 5,700 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 256 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 8000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation with others
NVIDIARTX 2000 Ada Generation vs
AMDRadeon RX 6700 XT
NVIDIARTX 2000 Ada Generation vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
NVIDIARTX 2000 Ada Generation vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 8GB
NVIDIARTX 2000 Ada Generation vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
NVIDIARTX 2000 Ada Generation vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
NVIDIARTX 2000 Ada Generation vs
AMDRadeon RX 7700 XT
