NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro GP100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation and NVIDIA Quadro GP100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1304 MHz
• Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1695 MHz vs 1442 MHz
• 756.2x more texture fill rate: 244.1 GTexel/s vs 322.8 GTexel / s
• Around 29% higher pipelines: 4608 vs 3584
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 16 nm
• 2x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 235 Watt
• Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1430 MHz
• Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 96938 vs 88540

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro GP100

• 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
• Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 847 vs 577

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro GP100

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	96938 88540
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	577 847
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	16345 16374

Compare specifications (specs)