NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 8 nm
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 320 Watt
- Around 20% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 10 GB
- Around 89% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 8 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 320 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 10 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 1290 MHz
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1710 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 465.1 GTexel/s vs 386.3 GTexel/s
- Around 17% higher pipelines: 8704 vs 7424
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1053 vs 731
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 25146 vs 22529
- Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 167014 vs 145628
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1440 MHz vs 1290 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1710 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 465.1 GTexel/s vs 386.3 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 8704 vs 7424 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1053 vs 731 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25146 vs 22529 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 167014 vs 145628 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 731 | 1053 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22529 | 25146 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 145628 | 167014 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 457.414 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6022.79 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.221 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2381.93 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34537 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34537 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4420 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
Code name | AD104 | GA102 |
Place in performance rating | 45 | 56 |
Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | 1710 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1290 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 8 nm |
Pipelines | 7424 | 8704 |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | 164.2 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 386.3 GTexel/s | 465.1 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 320 Watt |
Transistor count | 35800 million | 28300 million |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 465.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 29.77 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 29.77 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 12-pin |
Height | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | |
Length | 285 mm, 11.2 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 10 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 432.0 GB/s | 760.3 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 320 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |