NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
- Around 22% higher texture fill rate: 386.3 GTexel/s vs 317.4 GTexel/s
- Around 26% higher pipelines: 7424 vs 5888
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 8 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 220 Watt
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 29% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22747 vs 22347
- Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 146342 vs 123332
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 386.3 GTexel/s vs 317.4 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 7424 vs 5888 |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 8 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 220 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22747 vs 22347 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 146342 vs 123332 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1290 MHz
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 996 vs 739
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1290 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 996 vs 739 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 739 | 996 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22747 | 22347 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 146342 | 123332 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 182.055 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13676 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
Code name | AD104 | GA104 |
Place in performance rating | 43 | 46 |
Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | 1725 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1290 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 8 nm |
Pipelines | 7424 | 5888 |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | 165.6 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 386.3 GTexel/s | 317.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 220 Watt |
Transistor count | 35800 million | 17400 million |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 12-pin |
Height | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Length | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 432.0 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |