NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon RX 6600
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and AMD Radeon RX 6600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 300.5 GTexel/s vs 279.0 GTexel/s
- 3.4x more pipelines: 6144 vs 1792
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 7 nm
- Around 89% lower typical power consumption: 70 Watt vs 132 Watt
- 2.5x more maximum memory size: 20 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1136 vs 875
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20884 vs 15122
- Around 73% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 123109 vs 71351
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 Mar 2023 vs 13 Oct 2021 |
Texture fill rate | 300.5 GTexel/s vs 279.0 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 6144 vs 1792 |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 7 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt vs 132 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 20 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1136 vs 875 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20884 vs 15122 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 123109 vs 71351 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6600
- Around 26% higher core clock speed: 1626 MHz vs 1290 MHz
- Around 59% higher boost clock speed: 2491 MHz vs 1565 MHz
Core clock speed | 1626 MHz vs 1290 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2491 MHz vs 1565 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6600
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | AMD Radeon RX 6600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1136 | 875 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20884 | 15122 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 123109 | 71351 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 260.061 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5472.868 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.421 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 290.312 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.228 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 26778 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 69225 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 26778 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 69225 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8084 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | AMD Radeon RX 6600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
Code name | AD104 | Navi 23 XL |
Launch date | 21 Mar 2023 | 13 Oct 2021 |
Place in performance rating | 32 | 35 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1565 MHz | 2491 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1290 MHz | 1626 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 7 nm |
Pipelines | 6144 | 1792 |
Pixel fill rate | 125.2 GPixel/s | 159.4 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 300.5 GTexel/s | 279.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt | 132 Watt |
Transistor count | 35800 million | 11060 million |
Compute units | 28 | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 558.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 17.86 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.928 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 3 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Length | 168 mm, 6.6 inches | 190 mm (7.5 inches) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | 300 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Width | 69 mm, 2.7 inches | 110 mm (4.3 inches) |
Height | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 20 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 280.0 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 160 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |