NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 8 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 70 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1115 vs 1050
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 21 Mar 2023 vs 1 Sep 2020 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 8 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt vs 350 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1115 vs 1050 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1290 MHz
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1695 MHz vs 1565 MHz
- Around 85% higher texture fill rate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 300.5 GTexel/s
- Around 71% higher pipelines: 10496 vs 6144
- Around 20% higher maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 20 GB
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26747 vs 20854
- Around 57% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 191350 vs 121494
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 1290 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz vs 1565 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 556.0 GTexel/s vs 300.5 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 10496 vs 6144 |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 20 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26747 vs 20854 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 191350 vs 121494 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1115 | 1050 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 20854 | 26747 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 121494 | 191350 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 732.196 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 63.011 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.569 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19948 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Code name | AD104 | GA102 |
| Launch date | 21 Mar 2023 | 1 Sep 2020 |
| Place in performance rating | 32 | 45 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1499 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1565 MHz | 1695 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1290 MHz | 1395 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Pipelines | 6144 | 10496 |
| Pixel fill rate | 125.2 GPixel/s | 189.8 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 300.5 GTexel/s | 556.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Transistor count | 35800 million | 28300 million |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 168 mm, 6.6 inches | 313 mm (12.3 inches) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | 750 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 12-pin |
| Width | 69 mm, 2.7 inches | Triple-slot |
| Height | 138 mm (5.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 20 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 280.0 GB/s | 936.2 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 160 bit | 384 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation with others
NVIDIARTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs
NVIDIAA100 SXM4 80 GB
NVIDIARTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070
NVIDIARTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
NVIDIARTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs
NVIDIARTX A5500
NVIDIARTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
NVIDIARTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs
AMDRadeon RX 7700 XT
