NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 16GB vs AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 16GB and AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 16GB
- Around 25% higher texture fill rate: 515.3 GTexel/s vs 413.0 GTexel/s
- 3.8x more pipelines: 9728 vs 2560
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 7 nm
- Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 230 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 12 GB
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 81% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 180542 vs 99597
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 515.3 GTexel/s vs 413.0 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 9728 vs 2560 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 7 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 230 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 12 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 180542 vs 99597 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
- Around 74% higher core clock speed: 2321 MHz vs 1335 MHz
- Around 52% higher boost clock speed: 2581 MHz vs 1695 MHz
| Core clock speed | 2321 MHz vs 1335 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2581 MHz vs 1695 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 16GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 16GB | AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 180542 | 99597 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19867 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 941 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 349.422 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7129.567 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 34.064 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 197.183 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1699.337 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15315 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 18062 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 50772 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15315 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 18062 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 50772 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 12786 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 16GB | AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Code name | AD103 | Navi 22 |
| Place in performance rating | 47 | 50 |
| Launch date | 3 Mar 2021 | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $479 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | 2581 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1335 MHz | 2321 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Pipelines | 9728 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 189.8 GPixel/s | 165.2 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 515.3 GTexel/s | 413.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 230 Watt |
| Transistor count | 45900 million | 17200 million |
| Compute units | 40 | |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 825.9 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.43 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.21 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Height | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Width | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 576.0 GB/s | 384 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 16GB with others
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation 16GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation 16GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation 16GB vs
AMDRadeon RX 6700 XT
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation 16GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation 16GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 8GB
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation 16GB vs
NVIDIARTX 2000 Ada Generation
