NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 16GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 16GB and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 16GB
- Around 62% higher texture fill rate: 515.3 GTexel/s vs 317.4 GTexel/s
- Around 65% higher pipelines: 9728 vs 5888
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 83% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 220 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 29% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
- Around 48% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 181042 vs 122590
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 515.3 GTexel/s vs 317.4 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 9728 vs 5888 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 8 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 220 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 181042 vs 122590 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1335 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1695 MHz
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1335 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz vs 1695 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 16GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 16GB | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 181042 | 122590 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 22371 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 997 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 182.055 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13673 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 16GB | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Code name | AD103 | GA104 |
| Place in performance rating | 47 | 46 |
| Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | 1725 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1335 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Pipelines | 9728 | 5888 |
| Pixel fill rate | 189.8 GPixel/s | 165.6 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 515.3 GTexel/s | 317.4 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 220 Watt |
| Transistor count | 45900 million | 17400 million |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | Dual-slot |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 12-pin |
| Height | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
| Length | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 576.0 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 16GB with others
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation 16GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation 16GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation 16GB vs
AMDRadeon RX 6700 XT
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation 16GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation 16GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 8GB
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation 16GB vs
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation
