NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 vs NVIDIA RTX A5000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 and NVIDIA RTX A5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 99% higher core clock speed: 2325 MHz vs 1170 MHz
- Around 48% higher boost clock speed: 2512 MHz vs 1695 MHz
- Around 11% higher texture fill rate: 482.3 GTexel/s vs 433.9 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1286 vs 1032
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 28843 vs 22553
- Around 21% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 186565 vs 154729
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 4 Mar 2025 vs 12 Apr 2021 |
| Core clock speed | 2325 MHz vs 1170 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2512 MHz vs 1695 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 482.3 GTexel/s vs 433.9 GTexel/s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 8 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1286 vs 1032 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 28843 vs 22553 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 186565 vs 154729 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A5000
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 8192 vs 6144
- Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 12 GB
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz, 28 Gbps effective
| Pipelines | 8192 vs 6144 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 12 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz, 28 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070
GPU 2: NVIDIA RTX A5000
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 | NVIDIA RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1286 | 1032 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 28843 | 22553 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 186565 | 154729 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5077 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 581.432 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6836.931 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 54.372 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 191.518 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2038.811 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22508 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22508 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 | NVIDIA RTX A5000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Ampere |
| Code name | GB205 | GA102 |
| Launch date | 4 Mar 2025 | 12 Apr 2021 |
| Place in performance rating | 20 | 69 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2512 MHz | 1695 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 2325 MHz | 1170 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Pipelines | 6144 | 8192 |
| Pixel fill rate | 201.0 GPixel/s | 162.7 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 482.3 GTexel/s | 433.9 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 230 Watt |
| Transistor count | 31100 million | 28300 million |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 867.8 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 27.77 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 27.77 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
| Height | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | |
| Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 245 mm, 9.6 inches | 267 mm (10.5 inches) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | 550 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 16-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Width | 115 mm, 4.5 inches | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.8 | 6.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 672.0 GB/s | 768 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 384 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 28 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
