NVIDIA RTX A4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A4000 and NVIDIA Quadro P6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 758.6x more texture fill rate: 299.5 GTexel/s vs 394.8 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 6144 vs 3840
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 79% lower typical power consumption: 140 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19545 vs 15451
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1026 vs 725
- Around 90% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 121768 vs 63932
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 420.465 vs 194.277
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4156.52 vs 1916.09
- Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 32.297 vs 17.951
- 5.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 162.131 vs 31.471
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1895.111 vs 545.751
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22050 vs 20035
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22050 vs 20035
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 vs 1 October 2016 |
| Texture fill rate | 299.5 GTexel/s vs 394.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 6144 vs 3840 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19545 vs 15451 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1026 vs 725 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 121768 vs 63932 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 vs 194.277 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 vs 1916.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 vs 17.951 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 vs 31.471 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 vs 545.751 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 vs 20035 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 vs 20035 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P6000
- 2x more core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1645 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 16 GB
- 5.2x more memory clock speed: 9016 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- 3.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8770 vs 2604
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1645 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 16 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 9016 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8770 vs 2604 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P6000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19545 | 15451 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1026 | 725 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 121768 | 63932 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 | 194.277 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 | 1916.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 | 17.951 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 | 31.471 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 | 545.751 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 | 20035 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 | 20035 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2604 | 8770 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Code name | GA104 | GP102 |
| Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 | 1 October 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 108 | 204 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $5,999 | |
| Price now | $4,403.52 | |
| Type | Workstation | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 3.90 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1645 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1506 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 599.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 6144 | 3840 |
| Pixel fill rate | 149.8 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 299.5 GTexel/s | 394.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 17400 million | 11,800 million |
| Floating-point performance | 12,634 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort, DVI-D DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo |
| Multi-display synchronization | Quadro Sync II | |
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Single-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | 267 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1 x 8-pin |
| Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 2" (5.1 cm) |
| SLI options | 1 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 5.1 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 9016 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | 384 Bit |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| ECC (Error Correcting Code) | ||
| High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Desktop Management | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX A4000 with others
NVIDIARTX A4000 vs
NVIDIATesla T10 Processor
NVIDIARTX A4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080
NVIDIARTX A4000 vs
NVIDIATITAN RTX
NVIDIARTX A4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super
NVIDIARTX A4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
NVIDIARTX A4000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6650 XT
