NVIDIA RTX A4000 versus NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A4000 and NVIDIA Quadro P6000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A4000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 6 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 299.5 GTexel/s versus 394.8 GTexel / s
- Environ 60% de pipelines plus haut: 6144 versus 3840
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 79% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 140 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 19545 versus 15451
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1026 versus 725
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 121768 versus 63932
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 420.465 versus 194.277
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4156.52 versus 1916.09
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 32.297 versus 17.951
- 5.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 162.131 versus 31.471
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1895.111 versus 545.751
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22050 versus 20035
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22050 versus 20035
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 12 Apr 2021 versus 1 October 2016 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 299.5 GTexel/s versus 394.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 6144 versus 3840 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19545 versus 15451 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1026 versus 725 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 121768 versus 63932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 versus 194.277 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 versus 1916.09 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 versus 17.951 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 versus 31.471 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 versus 545.751 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 versus 20035 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 versus 20035 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P6000
- 2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1506 MHz versus 735 MHz
- Environ 5% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1645 MHz versus 1560 MHz
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 24 GB versus 16 GB
- 5.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 9016 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- 3.4x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8770 versus 2604
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz versus 735 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1645 MHz versus 1560 MHz |
Taille de mémore maximale | 24 GB versus 16 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 9016 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8770 versus 2604 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P6000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19545 | 15451 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1026 | 725 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 121768 | 63932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 | 194.277 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 | 1916.09 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 | 17.951 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 | 31.471 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 | 545.751 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 | 20035 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 | 20035 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2604 | 8770 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
Nom de code | GA104 | GP102 |
Date de sortie | 12 Apr 2021 | 1 October 2016 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 108 | 204 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $5,999 | |
Prix maintenant | $4,403.52 | |
Genre | Workstation | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 3.90 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1560 MHz | 1645 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 735 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 599.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 6144 | 3840 |
Pixel fill rate | 149.8 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 299.5 GTexel/s | 394.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 11,800 million |
Performance á point flottant | 12,634 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort, DVI-D DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo |
Synchronization de plusieurs écrans | Quadro Sync II | |
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 1 x 8-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 2" (5.1 cm) |
Options SLI | 1 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 5.1 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 16 GB | 24 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 9016 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | 384 Bit |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
ECC (Error Correcting Code) | ||
High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |