NVIDIA T400 vs NVIDIA Quadro P600
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T400 and NVIDIA Quadro P600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 979.4x more texture fill rate: 34.20 GTexel/s vs 34.92 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 40 Watt
- Around 52% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17019 vs 11181
- Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 58.805 vs 35.134
- Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 222.15 vs 141.164
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5088 vs 4662
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5088 vs 4662
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 6 May 2021 vs 7 February 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 34.20 GTexel/s vs 34.92 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 40 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17019 vs 11181 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.805 vs 35.134 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 222.15 vs 141.164 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5088 vs 4662 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5088 vs 4662 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P600
- 3.2x more core clock speed: 1329 MHz vs 420 MHz
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1557 MHz vs 1425 MHz
- 3.2x more memory clock speed: 4012 MHz vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 2173
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 2173
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1329 MHz vs 420 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1557 MHz vs 1425 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 2173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 2173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3346 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA T400
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P600
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA T400 | NVIDIA Quadro P600 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17019 | 11181 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.805 | 35.134 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.059 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.961 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 222.15 | 141.164 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5088 | 4662 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2173 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5088 | 4662 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2173 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3359 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3327 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 542 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA T400 | NVIDIA Quadro P600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | TU117 | GP107 |
Launch date | 6 May 2021 | 7 February 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 851 | 556 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $178 | |
Price now | $169.99 | |
Type | Workstation | |
Value for money (0-100) | 22.11 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz | 1557 MHz |
Core clock speed | 420 MHz | 1329 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 34.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.189 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,094 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 22.80 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 34.20 GTexel/s | 34.92 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 40 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 3,300 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,117 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 200 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 145 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.00 GB/s | 64.19 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective | 4012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |