NVIDIA T400 vs NVIDIA Quadro P600

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T400 and NVIDIA Quadro P600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T400

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • 979.4x more texture fill rate: 34.20 GTexel/s vs 34.92 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
  • Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 40 Watt
  • Around 52% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17019 vs 11181
  • Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 58.805 vs 35.134
  • Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 222.15 vs 141.164
  • Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5088 vs 4662
  • Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5088 vs 4662
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 6 May 2021 vs 7 February 2017
Texture fill rate 34.20 GTexel/s vs 34.92 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt vs 40 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 17019 vs 11181
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 58.805 vs 35.134
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 222.15 vs 141.164
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 5088 vs 4662
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 5088 vs 4662

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P600

  • 3.2x more core clock speed: 1329 MHz vs 420 MHz
  • Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1557 MHz vs 1425 MHz
  • 3.2x more memory clock speed: 4012 MHz vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective
  • Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 2173
  • Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 2173
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1329 MHz vs 420 MHz
Boost clock speed 1557 MHz vs 1425 MHz
Memory clock speed 4012 MHz vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 vs 2173
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 vs 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 vs 2173
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 vs 3346

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA T400
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P600

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
17019
11181
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
58.805
35.134
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
222.15
141.164
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5088
4662
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2173
3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3346
3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5088
4662
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2173
3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3346
3359
Name NVIDIA T400 NVIDIA Quadro P600
Geekbench - OpenCL 17019 11181
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 58.805 35.134
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 785.059
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.961
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 53.111
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 222.15 141.164
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 5088 4662
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2173 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3346 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 5088 4662
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2173 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3346 3359
PassMark - G3D Mark 3327
PassMark - G2D Mark 542

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA T400 NVIDIA Quadro P600

Essentials

Architecture Turing Pascal
Code name TU117 GP107
Launch date 6 May 2021 7 February 2017
Place in performance rating 851 556
Launch price (MSRP) $178
Price now $169.99
Type Workstation
Value for money (0-100) 22.11

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1425 MHz 1557 MHz
Core clock speed 420 MHz 1329 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 34.20 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 2.189 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 1,094 GFLOPS
Pipelines 384 384
Pixel fill rate 22.80 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 34.20 GTexel/s 34.92 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt 40 Watt
Transistor count 4700 million 3,300 million
Floating-point performance 1,117 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a 4x mini-DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Form factor Single-slot
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Recommended system power (PSU) 200 Watt
Supplementary power connectors None None
Length 145 mm

API support

DirectX 12 (12_1) 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 3.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.7 (6.4)
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 80.00 GB/s 64.19 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective 4012 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5