NVIDIA T600 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T600 and NVIDIA Tesla C2075 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 28% higher core clock speed: 735 MHz vs 575 MHz
- 1658.4x more texture fill rate: 53.40 GTexel/s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
- Around 43% higher pipelines: 640 vs 448
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 40 nm
- 6.2x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 247 Watt
- 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 27848 vs 10613
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 93.685 vs 26.973
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1176.034 vs 930.623
- Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.06 vs 3.142
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 55.328 vs 45.924
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 263.201 vs 93.747
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 vs 25 July 2011 |
| Core clock speed | 735 MHz vs 575 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 53.40 GTexel/s vs 32.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 448 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 247 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 27848 vs 10613 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 93.685 vs 26.973 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1176.034 vs 930.623 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.06 vs 3.142 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 55.328 vs 45.924 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 263.201 vs 93.747 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2075
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- 2.4x more memory clock speed: 3000 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA T600
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2075
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA T600 | NVIDIA Tesla C2075 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 27848 | 10613 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 93.685 | 26.973 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1176.034 | 930.623 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.06 | 3.142 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 55.328 | 45.924 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 263.201 | 93.747 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3017 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 428 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2825 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2825 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA T600 | NVIDIA Tesla C2075 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | TU117 | GF110 |
| Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 | 25 July 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 791 | 794 |
| Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1335 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 40 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 53.40 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 3.418 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.709 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 640 | 448 |
| Pixel fill rate | 42.72 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 53.40 GTexel/s | 32.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 247 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 3,000 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Single-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 200 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 248 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 144.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) | 3000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA T600 with others
NVIDIAT600 vs
NVIDIAQuadro4 380 XGL
NVIDIAT600 vs
ATIFireGL V7100
NVIDIAT600 vs
ATIMobility FireGL V5000
NVIDIAT600 vs
NVIDIATesla C2075
NVIDIAT600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 825M
NVIDIAT600 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 450
