NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA TITAN RTX and NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN RTX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1246 MHz
- Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1380 MHz
- 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1752 MHz
- Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20362 vs 12328
- Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 840 vs 484
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25820 vs 11451
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 vs 3555
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3198
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25820 vs 11451
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 vs 3555
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3198
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 December 2018 vs 21 June 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 1246 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1380 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1752 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20362 vs 12328 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 840 vs 484 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25820 vs 11451 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 vs 3555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3198 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25820 vs 11451 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 vs 3555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3198 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 4608
- Around 12% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 280 Watt
- Around 24% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 171055 vs 138072
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 4608 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 280 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 171055 vs 138072 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA TITAN RTX
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA TITAN RTX | NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20362 | 12328 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 840 | 484 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 138072 | 171055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25820 | 11451 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 | 3555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3198 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25820 | 11451 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 | 3555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3198 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3794 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA TITAN RTX | NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Volta |
Code name | TU102 | GV100 |
Launch date | 18 December 2018 | 21 June 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
Place in performance rating | 109 | 222 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz | 1380 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1246 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 4608 | 5120 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 280 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 18,600 million | 21,100 million |
Floating-point performance | 14,131 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 441.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
DisplayPort count | 3 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 4096 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1752 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 897.0 GB / s |