NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire and AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 1405 MHz vs 1156 MHz
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1471 MHz
- Around 7% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 3584
- 1157.1x better floating-point performance: 12,150 gflops vs 10.5 TFLOPs
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- 7.1x more memory clock speed: 11408 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4303.239 vs 1765.06
- Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 23.759 vs 12.606
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 163.551 vs 79.32
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1382.954 vs 1022.925
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16138 vs 14462
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16138 vs 14462
- Around 47% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10139 vs 6879
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 November 2017 vs 14 August 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1405 MHz vs 1156 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz vs 1471 MHz |
Pipelines | 3840 vs 3584 |
Floating-point performance | 12,150 gflops vs 10.5 TFLOPs |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 11408 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4303.239 vs 1765.06 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 23.759 vs 12.606 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 163.551 vs 79.32 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1382.954 vs 1022.925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16138 vs 14462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16138 vs 14462 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10139 vs 6879 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
- 869.1x more texture fill rate: 330.00 GTexel/s vs 379.7 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 19% lower typical power consumption: 210 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 163998 vs 65520
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 184.405 vs 146.609
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 330.00 GTexel/s vs 379.7 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 210 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 163998 vs 65520 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 184.405 vs 146.609 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire | AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 65520 | 163998 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 146.609 | 184.405 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4303.239 | 1765.06 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 23.759 | 12.606 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 163.551 | 79.32 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1382.954 | 1022.925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16138 | 14462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16138 | 14462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3361 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10139 | 6879 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13221 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 767 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire | AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | GP102 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 4 November 2017 | 14 August 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,199 | $399 |
Place in performance rating | 227 | 224 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | Radeon RX Vega Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz | 1471 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1405 MHz | 1156 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 12,150 gflops | 10.5 TFLOPs |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 3840 | 3584 |
Texture fill rate | 379.7 GTexel / s | 330.00 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 210 Watt |
Transistor count | 11,800 million | 12,500 million |
Compute units | 56 | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 21 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.5 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 94.00 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 3584 | |
Texture Units | 256 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 547.6 GB / s | 410 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 2048 bit |
Memory clock speed | 11408 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5X | HBM2 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
ZeroCore |