NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
• Around 23% higher core clock speed: 1405 MHz vs 1138 MHz
• Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1250 MHz
• Around 26% higher texture fill rate: 379.7 GTexel / s vs 302.4 GTexel / s
• Around 7% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 3584
• Around 26% better floating-point performance: 12,150 gflops vs 9,677 gflops
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
• 7.3x more memory clock speed: 11408 MHz vs 1572 MHz
• Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 65520 vs 61755
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4303.239 vs 1722.138
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 23.759 vs 11.901
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 163.551 vs 126.528
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1382.954 vs 1172.788
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16138 vs 12822
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16138 vs 12822

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56

• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 19% lower typical power consumption: 210 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 153.117 vs 146.609

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	65520 61755
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	146.609 153.117
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4303.239 1722.138
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	23.759 11.901
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	163.551 126.528
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1382.954 1172.788
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16138 12822
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3714 3709
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16138 12822
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3714 3709
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 3353

Compare specifications (specs)