NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order and AMD Radeon R9 FURY X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 51% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• Around 41% higher texture fill rate: 379.7 GTexel / s vs 268.8 GTexel / s
• Around 41% better floating-point performance: 12,150 gflops vs 8,602 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 275 Watt
• 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
• 10.9x more memory clock speed: 11408 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4303.239 vs 3431.249
• Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 23.759 vs 12.49
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 163.551 vs 153.089
• Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1382.954 vs 857.575
• Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16138 vs 8673
• Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16138 vs 8673
• Around 96% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10139 vs 5170

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

• Around 7% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 3840
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 155.307 vs 146.609
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8925 vs 3714
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8925 vs 3714

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	146.609 155.307
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4303.239 3431.249
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	23.759 12.49
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	163.551 153.089
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1382.954 857.575
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16138 8673
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3714 8925
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 3361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16138 8673
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3714 8925
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 3361
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	10139 5170

Compare specifications (specs)