NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 and NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 586x more texture fill rate: 222.5 GTexel/s vs 379.7 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 56% lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 85176 vs 65520
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.872 vs 23.759
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 vs 16138
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 vs 16138
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 November 2018 vs 4 November 2017 |
| Texture fill rate | 222.5 GTexel/s vs 379.7 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85176 vs 65520 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 vs 23.759 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 vs 16138 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 vs 16138 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3355 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
- Around 40% higher core clock speed: 1405 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2304
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- 7x more memory clock speed: 11408 MHz vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 296.223 vs 232.933
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4303.239 vs 3728.135
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 163.551 vs 136.223
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1382.954 vs 1011.233
- Around 25% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2345 vs 1881
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1405 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
| Pipelines | 3840 vs 2304 |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 11408 MHz vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 296.223 vs 232.933 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4303.239 vs 3728.135 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 163.551 vs 136.223 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1382.954 vs 1011.233 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2345 vs 1881 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85176 | 65520 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 | 296.223 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 | 4303.239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 | 23.759 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.223 | 163.551 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1011.233 | 1382.954 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 | 16138 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 | 16138 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1881 | 2345 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Code name | TU104 | GP102 |
| GCN generation | Quadro RTX | |
| Launch date | 13 November 2018 | 4 November 2017 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $899 | $1,199 |
| Place in performance rating | 213 | 215 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1582 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1005 MHz | 1405 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.5 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.24 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.119 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 3840 |
| Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Texture fill rate | 222.5 GTexel/s | 379.7 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 11,800 million |
| Floating-point performance | 12,150 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 9.5 inches (241 mm) | 267 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 416.0 GB/s | 547.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) | 11408 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5700
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AppleA14 Bionic
