NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs ATI Radeon HD 4730

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla C2050 and ATI Radeon HD 4730 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2050

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • Around 34% higher texture fill rate: 32.2 GTexel / s vs 24 GTexel / s
  • Around 7% better floating-point performance: 1,030.4 gflops vs 960.0 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
  • 6x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 512 MB
  • Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 9064 vs 7497
  • Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 9064 vs 7497
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 25 July 2011 vs 8 June 2009
Texture fill rate 32.2 GTexel / s vs 24 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance 1,030.4 gflops vs 960.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm vs 55 nm
Maximum memory size 3 GB vs 512 MB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 9064 vs 7497
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 9064 vs 7497

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4730

  • Around 30% higher core clock speed: 750 MHz vs 575 MHz
  • Around 43% higher pipelines: 640 vs 448
  • 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 238 Watt
  • Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 3000 MHz
Core clock speed 750 MHz vs 575 MHz
Pipelines 640 vs 448
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 110 Watt vs 238 Watt
Memory clock speed 3600 MHz vs 3000 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla C2050
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4730

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9064
7497
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9064
7497
Name NVIDIA Tesla C2050 ATI Radeon HD 4730
PassMark - G3D Mark 3176
PassMark - G2D Mark 362
Geekbench - OpenCL 11024
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 26.055
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 901.157
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.99
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 41.654
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 89.869
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 5962
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 9064 7497
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 5962
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 9064 7497

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Tesla C2050 ATI Radeon HD 4730

Essentials

Architecture Fermi TeraScale
Code name GF100 RV770
Launch date 25 July 2011 8 June 2009
Place in performance rating 578 579
Type Workstation Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $79

Technical info

Core clock speed 575 MHz 750 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,030.4 gflops 960.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 55 nm
Pipelines 448 640
Texture fill rate 32.2 GTexel / s 24 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 238 Watt 110 Watt
Transistor count 3,100 million 956 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI 2x DVI, 1x S-Video

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 248 mm 241 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin 1x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 10.1
OpenGL 4.6 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 144.0 GB / s 57.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 384 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 3000 MHz 3600 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5