NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM and NVIDIA Tesla C2050 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 59% higher core clock speed: 915 MHz vs 575 MHz
• 3.4x more texture fill rate: 109.8 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
• 3x more pipelines: 1344 vs 448
• 2.6x better floating-point performance: 2,634 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 170 Watt vs 238 Watt
• 2x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 3000 MHz
• Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5255 vs 3176
• Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 573 vs 362
• Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14380 vs 11024
• Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 41.336 vs 26.055
• Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1351.496 vs 901.157
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.121 vs 2.99
• Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 58.14 vs 41.654
• Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 156.419 vs 89.869

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2050

• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5962 vs 3716
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 9064 vs 3357
• Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5962 vs 3716
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 9064 vs 3357

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2050

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	5255 3176
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	573 362
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	14380 11024
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	41.336 26.055
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1351.496 901.157
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.121 2.99
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	58.14 41.654
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	156.419 89.869
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3716 5962
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 9064
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3716 5962
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 9064

Compare specifications (specs)