NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 and NVIDIA Tesla C2050 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 70% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 575 MHz
• 2.9x more texture fill rate: 94.1 billion / sec vs 32.2 GTexel / s
• 2.6x more pipelines: 1152 vs 448
• 2.3x better floating-point performance: 2,378 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 170 Watt vs 238 Watt
• 2x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 3000 MHz
• Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4799 vs 3176
• Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 530 vs 362
• Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14283 vs 11024
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.505 vs 26.055
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.09 vs 2.99

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2050

• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 901.157 vs 864.402
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 41.654 vs 40.457
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 89.869 vs 84.186
• Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5962 vs 3718
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 9064 vs 3357
• Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5962 vs 3718
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 9064 vs 3357

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2050

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	4799 3176
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	530 362
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	14283 11024
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	37.505 26.055
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	864.402 901.157
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.09 2.99
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	40.457 41.654
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	84.186 89.869
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 5962
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 9064
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 5962
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 9064

Compare specifications (specs)