AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition and NVIDIA Tesla C2050 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 39% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 575 MHz
- 2.8x more texture fill rate: 89.6 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 1792 vs 448
- 2.8x better floating-point performance: 2,867 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 19% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 238 Watt
- Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 3000 MHz
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.802 vs 26.055
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1230.769 vs 901.157
- Around 96% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 81.68 vs 41.654
- 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 370.179 vs 89.869
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 March 2013 vs 25 July 2011 |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 89.6 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 448 |
Floating-point performance | 2,867 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 238 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 3000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.802 vs 26.055 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1230.769 vs 901.157 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 81.68 vs 41.654 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 370.179 vs 89.869 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2050
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition | NVIDIA Tesla C2050 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.802 | 26.055 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1230.769 | 901.157 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 81.68 | 41.654 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 370.179 | 89.869 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3176 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 362 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11024 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.99 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5962 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9064 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5962 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9064 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition | NVIDIA Tesla C2050 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Tahiti | GF100 |
Launch date | 7 March 2013 | 25 July 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | |
Place in performance rating | 577 | 578 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 575 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,867 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 448 |
Texture fill rate | 89.6 GTexel / s | 32.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 238 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 3,100 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 279 mm | 248 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 240.0 GB / s | 144.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |