NVIDIA Tesla C2070 vs ATI Radeon X550 XTX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla C2070 and ATI Radeon X550 XTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2070
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 44% higher core clock speed: 575 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 10.1x more texture fill rate: 32.2 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 110 nm
- 48x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 128 MB
- 5x more memory clock speed: 3000 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 44x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3121 vs 71
- Around 93% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 462 vs 240
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 25 July 2011 vs 24 January 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 575 MHz vs 400 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 32.2 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 110 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 128 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3121 vs 71 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 462 vs 240 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla C2070
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X550 XTX
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Tesla C2070 | ATI Radeon X550 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3121 | 71 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 462 | 240 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9716 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.223 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 908.754 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.015 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 43.519 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 93.344 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3245 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3245 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Tesla C2070 | ATI Radeon X550 XTX | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | R400 |
| Code name | GF100 | RV410 |
| Launch date | 25 July 2011 | 24 January 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 750 | 752 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 575 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 110 nm |
| Pipelines | 448 | |
| Texture fill rate | 32.2 GTexel / s | 3.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 238 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | 120 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 9.0b |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 128 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB / s | 4.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |
