NVIDIA Tesla C2070 vs ATI Radeon HD 5850

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla C2070 and ATI Radeon HD 5850 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2070

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• 6x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3121 vs 1968
• Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 462 vs 410
• Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.223 vs 16.467
• Around 96% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.015 vs 1.541
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 43.519 vs 42.08

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5850

• Around 26% higher core clock speed: 725 MHz vs 575 MHz
• Around 62% higher texture fill rate: 52.2 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
• 3.2x more pipelines: 1440 vs 448
• 2x better floating-point performance: 2,088.0 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops
• Around 58% lower typical power consumption: 151 Watt vs 238 Watt
• Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 3000 MHz
• 3.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 33977 vs 9716
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1109.612 vs 908.754
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3806 vs 3245
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3806 vs 3245

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla C2070
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5850

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3121 1968
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	462 410
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9716 33977
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	26.223 16.467
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	908.754 1109.612
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.015 1.541
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	43.519 42.08
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3245 3806
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3351 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3245 3806
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3351 3358

Compare specifications (specs)