NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs ATI FirePro V9800
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla C2075 and ATI FirePro V9800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2075
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 1% lower typical power consumption: 247 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3017 vs 2727
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.973 vs 9.718
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 930.623 vs 738.1
- 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.142 vs 0.867
- Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.924 vs 27.153
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 July 2011 vs 9 September 2010 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 247 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3017 vs 2727 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.973 vs 9.718 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 930.623 vs 738.1 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.142 vs 0.867 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.924 vs 27.153 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V9800
- Around 48% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 575 MHz
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 68.0 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
- 3.6x more pipelines: 1600 vs 448
- 2.6x better floating-point performance: 2,720.0 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops
- Around 53% higher memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 3000 MHz
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 655 vs 428
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 118.756 vs 93.747
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 68.0 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1600 vs 448 |
Floating-point performance | 2,720.0 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz vs 3000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 655 vs 428 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 118.756 vs 93.747 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla C2075
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V9800
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla C2075 | ATI FirePro V9800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3017 | 2727 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 428 | 655 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9885 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.973 | 9.718 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 930.623 | 738.1 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.142 | 0.867 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.924 | 27.153 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 93.747 | 118.756 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2825 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2825 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 | ATI FirePro V9800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GF110 | Cypress |
Launch date | 25 July 2011 | 9 September 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 781 | 627 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,499 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 575 MHz | 850 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | 2,720.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 448 | 1600 |
Texture fill rate | 32.2 GTexel / s | 68.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 247 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 2,154 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 248 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB / s | 147.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | 4600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |