NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs AMD Radeon HD 6970M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla C2075 and AMD Radeon HD 6970M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2075

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
  • 6x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 1 GB
  • Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3017 vs 2270
  • 3.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10493 vs 3349
  • 5.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.973 vs 4.787
  • Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 930.623 vs 617.819
  • 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.142 vs 0.927
  • Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.924 vs 24.456
  • Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 vs 3229
  • Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 vs 3229
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 25 July 2011 vs 4 January 2011
Maximum memory size 6 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3017 vs 2270
Geekbench - OpenCL 10493 vs 3349
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 26.973 vs 4.787
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 930.623 vs 617.819
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.142 vs 0.927
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 45.924 vs 24.456
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3705 vs 3229
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3346 vs 3342
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3705 vs 3229
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3346 vs 3342

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6970M

  • Around 18% higher core clock speed: 680 MHz vs 575 MHz
  • Around 1% higher texture fill rate: 32.6 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
  • 2.1x more pipelines: 960 vs 448
  • Around 27% better floating-point performance: 1,305.6 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops
  • 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 247 Watt
  • Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 3000 MHz
  • Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 656 vs 428
  • Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 117.801 vs 93.747
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 680 MHz vs 575 MHz
Texture fill rate 32.6 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines 960 vs 448
Floating-point performance 1,305.6 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt vs 247 Watt
Memory clock speed 3600 MHz vs 3000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 656 vs 428
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 117.801 vs 93.747

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla C2075
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6970M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
3017
2270
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
428
656
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
10493
3349
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
26.973
4.787
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
930.623
617.819
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3.142
0.927
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
45.924
24.456
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
93.747
117.801
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3705
3229
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3346
3342
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3705
3229
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3346
3342
Name NVIDIA Tesla C2075 AMD Radeon HD 6970M
PassMark - G3D Mark 3017 2270
PassMark - G2D Mark 428 656
Geekbench - OpenCL 10493 3349
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 26.973 4.787
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 930.623 617.819
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.142 0.927
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 45.924 24.456
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 93.747 117.801
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2825
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3705 3229
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3346 3342
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2825
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3705 3229
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3346 3342

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Tesla C2075 AMD Radeon HD 6970M

Essentials

Architecture Fermi 2.0 TeraScale 2
Code name GF110 Blackcomb
Launch date 25 July 2011 4 January 2011
Place in performance rating 787 790
Type Workstation Laptop

Technical info

Core clock speed 575 MHz 680 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,030.4 gflops 1,305.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 448 960
Texture fill rate 32.2 GTexel / s 32.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 247 Watt 75 Watt
Transistor count 3,000 million 1,700 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 MXM-B (3.0)
Length 248 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin None
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.4

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 144.0 GB / s 115.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 384 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 3000 MHz 3600 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0