NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs AMD Radeon HD 6970M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla C2075 and AMD Radeon HD 6970M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2075
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- 6x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3017 vs 2270
- 3.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10493 vs 3349
- 5.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.973 vs 4.787
- Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 930.623 vs 617.819
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.142 vs 0.927
- Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.924 vs 24.456
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 vs 3229
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 vs 3229
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 July 2011 vs 4 January 2011 |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3017 vs 2270 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10493 vs 3349 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.973 vs 4.787 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 930.623 vs 617.819 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.142 vs 0.927 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.924 vs 24.456 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 vs 3229 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 vs 3229 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 3342 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6970M
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 680 MHz vs 575 MHz
- Around 1% higher texture fill rate: 32.6 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
- 2.1x more pipelines: 960 vs 448
- Around 27% better floating-point performance: 1,305.6 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 247 Watt
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 3000 MHz
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 656 vs 428
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 117.801 vs 93.747
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 680 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 32.6 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 960 vs 448 |
Floating-point performance | 1,305.6 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 247 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 3000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 656 vs 428 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 117.801 vs 93.747 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla C2075
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6970M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla C2075 | AMD Radeon HD 6970M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3017 | 2270 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 428 | 656 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10493 | 3349 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.973 | 4.787 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 930.623 | 617.819 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.142 | 0.927 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.924 | 24.456 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 93.747 | 117.801 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2825 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 | 3229 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2825 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 | 3229 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3342 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 | AMD Radeon HD 6970M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GF110 | Blackcomb |
Launch date | 25 July 2011 | 4 January 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 788 | 791 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 575 MHz | 680 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | 1,305.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 448 | 960 |
Texture fill rate | 32.2 GTexel / s | 32.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 247 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 1,700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 248 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB / s | 115.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |