NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs AMD Radeon HD 6970M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla C2075 and AMD Radeon HD 6970M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Tesla C2075

AMD Radeon HD 6970M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2075

Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
6x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 1 GB
Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3017 vs 2270
3.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10493 vs 3349
5.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.973 vs 4.787
Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 930.623 vs 617.819
3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.142 vs 0.927
Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.924 vs 24.456
Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 vs 3229
Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 vs 3229

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	25 July 2011 vs 4 January 2011
Maximum memory size	6 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3017 vs 2270
Geekbench - OpenCL	10493 vs 3349
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	26.973 vs 4.787
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	930.623 vs 617.819
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.142 vs 0.927
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	45.924 vs 24.456
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3705 vs 3229
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3346 vs 3342
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3705 vs 3229
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3346 vs 3342

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6970M

Around 18% higher core clock speed: 680 MHz vs 575 MHz
Around 1% higher texture fill rate: 32.6 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
2.1x more pipelines: 960 vs 448
Around 27% better floating-point performance: 1,305.6 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops
3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 247 Watt
Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 3000 MHz
Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 656 vs 428
Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 117.801 vs 93.747

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	680 MHz vs 575 MHz
Texture fill rate	32.6 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	960 vs 448
Floating-point performance	1,305.6 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 247 Watt
Memory clock speed	3600 MHz vs 3000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	656 vs 428
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	117.801 vs 93.747

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla C2075
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6970M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3017

2270

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

428

656

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

10493

3349

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

26.973

4.787

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

930.623

617.819

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3.142

0.927

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

45.924

24.456

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

93.747

117.801

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3705

3229

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3346

3342

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3705

3229

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3346

3342

Name	NVIDIA Tesla C2075	AMD Radeon HD 6970M
PassMark - G3D Mark	3017	2270
PassMark - G2D Mark	428	656
Geekbench - OpenCL	10493	3349
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	26.973	4.787
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	930.623	617.819
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.142	0.927
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	45.924	24.456
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	93.747	117.801
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2825
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3705	3229
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3346	3342
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2825
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3705	3229
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3346	3342

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Tesla C2075	AMD Radeon HD 6970M
Essentials
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	TeraScale 2
Code name	GF110	Blackcomb
Launch date	25 July 2011	4 January 2011
Place in performance rating	789	791
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Technical info
Core clock speed	575 MHz	680 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,030.4 gflops	1,305.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	448	960
Texture fill rate	32.2 GTexel / s	32.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	247 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	3,000 million	1,700 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Length	248 mm
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	None
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	144.0 GB / s	115.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	384 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	3000 MHz	3600 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0