NVIDIA Tesla K40m vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K40m and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K40m
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 667 MHz vs 612 MHz
- 4.6x more texture fill rate: 178.8 GTexel / s vs 39.2 billion / sec
- 22.5x more pipelines: 2880 vs 128
- 11.1x better floating-point performance: 4,291 gflops vs 387.1 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 90 nm
- 24x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 512 MB
- 5.6x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1080 MHz
- 4.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3143 vs 643
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 November 2013 vs 2 May 2007 |
Core clock speed | 667 MHz vs 612 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 178.8 GTexel / s vs 39.2 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2880 vs 128 |
Floating-point performance | 4,291 gflops vs 387.1 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 90 nm |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1080 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3143 vs 643 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra
- Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 171 Watt vs 245 Watt
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 252 vs 184
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 171 Watt vs 245 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 252 vs 184 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K40m
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla K40m | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19542 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 68.519 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1884.11 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.358 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.253 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 310.472 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 184 | 252 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3143 | 643 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla K40m | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Tesla |
Code name | GK110B | G80 |
Launch date | 22 November 2013 | 2 May 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $7,699 | $829 |
Place in performance rating | 613 | 616 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 745 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 667 MHz | 612 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4,291 gflops | 387.1 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 90 nm |
Pipelines | 2880 | 128 |
Texture fill rate | 178.8 GTexel / s | 39.2 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 245 Watt | 171 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,080 million | 681 million |
CUDA cores | 612 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 270 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.4 GB / s | 103.7 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 1080 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
SLI |