AMD Radeon R9 350 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40m
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 350 and NVIDIA Tesla K40m videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 350
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 39% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 667 MHz
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 245 Watt
Launch date | 12 June 2015 vs 22 November 2013 |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 667 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt vs 245 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K40m
- 3.8x more pipelines: 2880 vs 768
- 6x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 2 GB
- 5.3x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective)
- Around 98% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19542 vs 9892
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2880 vs 768 |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19542 vs 9892 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 350
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K40m
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 350 | NVIDIA Tesla K40m |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9892 | 19542 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2609 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2609 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3911 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3911 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9664 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9664 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 68.519 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1884.11 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.358 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.253 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 310.472 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 184 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3143 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 350 | NVIDIA Tesla K40m | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tobago | Kepler |
Launch date | 12 June 2015 | 22 November 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 610 | 613 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Code name | GK110B | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $7,699 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 667 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1421 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | 2880 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 245 Watt |
Boost clock speed | 745 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 4,291 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 178.8 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 7,080 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2 x DisplayPort, DVI | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDCP | ||
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 288.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |