AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40m

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 and NVIDIA Tesla K40m videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • Around 69% higher core clock speed: 1125 MHz vs 667 MHz
  • Around 61% higher boost clock speed: 1201 MHz vs 745 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 4.9x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 245 Watt
  • Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3648 vs 3143
  • 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 644 vs 184
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 10 November 2016 vs 22 November 2013
Core clock speed 1125 MHz vs 667 MHz
Boost clock speed 1201 MHz vs 745 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt vs 245 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3648 vs 3143
PassMark - G2D Mark 644 vs 184

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K40m

  • 2.3x more texture fill rate: 178.8 GTexel / s vs 76.86 GTexel / s
  • 2.8x more pipelines: 2880 vs 1024
  • Around 74% better floating-point performance: 4,291 gflops vs 2,460 gflops
  • 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
  • Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19542 vs 17726
  • Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 68.519 vs 55.077
  • 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1884.11 vs 830.773
  • Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.358 vs 4.132
  • Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.253 vs 82.584
  • Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 310.472 vs 225.985
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 178.8 GTexel / s vs 76.86 GTexel / s
Pipelines 2880 vs 1024
Floating-point performance 4,291 gflops vs 2,460 gflops
Maximum memory size 12 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed 6008 MHz vs 6000 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 19542 vs 17726
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 68.519 vs 55.077
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1884.11 vs 830.773
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 6.358 vs 4.132
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 117.253 vs 82.584
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 310.472 vs 225.985

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K40m

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
3648
3143
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
644
184
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
17726
19542
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
55.077
68.519
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
830.773
1884.11
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4.132
6.358
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
82.584
117.253
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
225.985
310.472
Name AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 NVIDIA Tesla K40m
PassMark - G3D Mark 3648 3143
PassMark - G2D Mark 644 184
Geekbench - OpenCL 17726 19542
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 55.077 68.519
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 830.773 1884.11
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 4.132 6.358
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 82.584 117.253
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 225.985 310.472
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 5431
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1123
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2678
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 5431
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1123
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2678

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 NVIDIA Tesla K40m

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 Kepler
Code name Baffin GK110B
Launch date 10 November 2016 22 November 2013
Launch price (MSRP) $399 $7,699
Place in performance rating 611 613
Price now $259.99
Type Workstation Workstation
Value for money (0-100) 19.63

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1201 MHz 745 MHz
Core clock speed 1125 MHz 667 MHz
Floating-point performance 2,460 gflops 4,291 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 1024 2880
Texture fill rate 76.86 GTexel / s 178.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 245 Watt
Transistor count 3,000 million 7,080 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 4x mini-DisplayPort No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 12 GB
Memory bandwidth 96 GB / s 288.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 6000 MHz 6008 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5