AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40m
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 and NVIDIA Tesla K40m videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 69% higher core clock speed: 1125 MHz vs 667 MHz
- Around 61% higher boost clock speed: 1201 MHz vs 745 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.9x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 245 Watt
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3651 vs 3143
- 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 648 vs 184
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 November 2016 vs 22 November 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1125 MHz vs 667 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1201 MHz vs 745 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 245 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3651 vs 3143 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 648 vs 184 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K40m
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 178.8 GTexel / s vs 76.86 GTexel / s
- 2.8x more pipelines: 2880 vs 1024
- Around 74% better floating-point performance: 4,291 gflops vs 2,460 gflops
- 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19542 vs 17728
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 68.519 vs 55.077
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1884.11 vs 830.773
- Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.358 vs 4.132
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.253 vs 82.584
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 310.472 vs 225.985
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 178.8 GTexel / s vs 76.86 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2880 vs 1024 |
Floating-point performance | 4,291 gflops vs 2,460 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 6000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19542 vs 17728 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 68.519 vs 55.077 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1884.11 vs 830.773 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.358 vs 4.132 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.253 vs 82.584 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 310.472 vs 225.985 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K40m
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 | NVIDIA Tesla K40m |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3651 | 3143 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 648 | 184 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17728 | 19542 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55.077 | 68.519 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 830.773 | 1884.11 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.132 | 6.358 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 82.584 | 117.253 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 225.985 | 310.472 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5431 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1123 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2678 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5431 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1123 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2678 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 | NVIDIA Tesla K40m | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Baffin | GK110B |
Launch date | 10 November 2016 | 22 November 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $7,699 |
Place in performance rating | 611 | 613 |
Price now | $259.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 19.63 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1201 MHz | 745 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1125 MHz | 667 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,460 gflops | 4,291 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 2880 |
Texture fill rate | 76.86 GTexel / s | 178.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 245 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 7,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 288.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |