NVIDIA Tesla K40m vs ATI Radeon HD 5970

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K40m and ATI Radeon HD 5970 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K40m

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 745 MHz vs 725 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 22% lower typical power consumption: 245 Watt vs 300 Watt
• 6x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 4000 MHz
• Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3143 vs 2282

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5970

• Around 9% higher core clock speed: 725 MHz vs 667 MHz
• Around 44% higher texture fill rate: 2x 58.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 178.8 GTexel / s
• Around 11% higher pipelines: 2x 1600 vs 2880
• Around 8% better floating-point performance: 2x 2,320.0 gflops vs 4,291 gflops
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 418 vs 184

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K40m
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5970

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	184 418
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3143 2282

Compare specifications (specs)