NVIDIA Tesla K40m vs NVIDIA GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K40m and NVIDIA GeForce FX 5950 Ultra videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K40m
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 40% higher core clock speed: 667 MHz vs 475 MHz
- 94.1x more texture fill rate: 178.8 GTexel / s vs 1.9 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 130 nm
- 48x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 256 MB
- 6.3x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 950 MHz
- 53.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3143 vs 59
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 November 2013 vs 23 October 2003 |
Core clock speed | 667 MHz vs 475 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 178.8 GTexel / s vs 1.9 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 130 nm |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 950 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3143 vs 59 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 74 Watt vs 245 Watt
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 274 vs 184
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 74 Watt vs 245 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 274 vs 184 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K40m
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla K40m | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5950 Ultra |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19542 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 68.519 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1884.11 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.358 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.253 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 310.472 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 184 | 274 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3143 | 59 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla K40m | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5950 Ultra | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Rankine |
Code name | GK110B | NV38 A1 |
Launch date | 22 November 2013 | 23 October 2003 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $7,699 | $499 |
Place in performance rating | 593 | 611 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 745 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 667 MHz | 475 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4,291 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 2880 | |
Texture fill rate | 178.8 GTexel / s | 1.9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 245 Watt | 74 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,080 million | 135 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
Length | 267 mm | 229 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x Molex | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 9.0a |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.4 GB / s | 30.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 950 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |