AMD Radeon R9 M290X vs NVIDIA Tesla K40m
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M290X and NVIDIA Tesla K40m videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M290X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 27% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 667 MHz
- Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 900 MHz vs 745 MHz
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 245 Watt
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3282 vs 3143
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 426 vs 184
- Around 21% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 23558 vs 19542
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 9 January 2014 vs 22 November 2013 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 667 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 900 MHz vs 745 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 245 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3282 vs 3143 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 426 vs 184 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 23558 vs 19542 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K40m
- 2.5x more texture fill rate: 178.8 GTexel / s vs 72 GTexel / s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 2880 vs 1280
- Around 86% better floating-point performance: 4,291 gflops vs 2,304 gflops
- 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
- 5x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 68.519 vs 51.022
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1884.11 vs 936.497
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.358 vs 5.62
- Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.253 vs 77.584
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 310.472 vs 258.046
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 178.8 GTexel / s vs 72 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2880 vs 1280 |
Floating-point performance | 4,291 gflops vs 2,304 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 68.519 vs 51.022 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1884.11 vs 936.497 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.358 vs 5.62 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.253 vs 77.584 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 310.472 vs 258.046 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M290X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K40m
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M290X | NVIDIA Tesla K40m |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3282 | 3143 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 426 | 184 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 23558 | 19542 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 51.022 | 68.519 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 936.497 | 1884.11 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.62 | 6.358 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 77.584 | 117.253 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 258.046 | 310.472 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6666 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2581 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2526 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6666 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2581 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2526 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 M290X | NVIDIA Tesla K40m | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Neptune | GK110B |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Launch date | 9 January 2014 | 22 November 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 592 | 593 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $7,699 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | 745 MHz |
Compute units | 20 | |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 667 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,304 gflops | 4,291 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | 2880 |
Texture fill rate | 72 GTexel / s | 178.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 245 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 7,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_1) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 288.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |