AMD Radeon R9 M290X vs NVIDIA Tesla K40m

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M290X and NVIDIA Tesla K40m videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M290X

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
  • Around 27% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 667 MHz
  • Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 900 MHz vs 745 MHz
  • 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 245 Watt
  • Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3282 vs 3143
  • 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 426 vs 184
  • Around 21% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 23558 vs 19542
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 9 January 2014 vs 22 November 2013
Core clock speed 850 MHz vs 667 MHz
Boost clock speed 900 MHz vs 745 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 100 Watt vs 245 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3282 vs 3143
PassMark - G2D Mark 426 vs 184
Geekbench - OpenCL 23558 vs 19542

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K40m

  • 2.5x more texture fill rate: 178.8 GTexel / s vs 72 GTexel / s
  • 2.3x more pipelines: 2880 vs 1280
  • Around 86% better floating-point performance: 4,291 gflops vs 2,304 gflops
  • 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
  • 5x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1200 MHz
  • Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 68.519 vs 51.022
  • 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1884.11 vs 936.497
  • Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.358 vs 5.62
  • Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.253 vs 77.584
  • Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 310.472 vs 258.046
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 178.8 GTexel / s vs 72 GTexel / s
Pipelines 2880 vs 1280
Floating-point performance 4,291 gflops vs 2,304 gflops
Maximum memory size 12 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed 6008 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 68.519 vs 51.022
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1884.11 vs 936.497
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 6.358 vs 5.62
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 117.253 vs 77.584
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 310.472 vs 258.046

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M290X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K40m

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
3282
3143
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
426
184
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
23558
19542
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
51.022
68.519
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
936.497
1884.11
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5.62
6.358
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
77.584
117.253
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
258.046
310.472
Name AMD Radeon R9 M290X NVIDIA Tesla K40m
PassMark - G3D Mark 3282 3143
PassMark - G2D Mark 426 184
Geekbench - OpenCL 23558 19542
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 51.022 68.519
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 936.497 1884.11
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.62 6.358
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 77.584 117.253
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 258.046 310.472
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6666
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2581
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2526
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 6666
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2581
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2526

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R9 M290X NVIDIA Tesla K40m

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 Kepler
Code name Neptune GK110B
Design AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
Launch date 9 January 2014 22 November 2013
Place in performance rating 592 593
Type Desktop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $7,699

Technical info

Boost clock speed 900 MHz 745 MHz
Compute units 20
Core clock speed 850 MHz 667 MHz
Floating-point performance 2,304 gflops 4,291 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 1280 2880
Texture fill rate 72 GTexel / s 178.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 100 Watt 245 Watt
Transistor count 2,800 million 7,080 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
Eyefinity

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size large
Supplementary power connectors None
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 11 12.0 (11_1)
Mantle
OpenCL Not Listed
OpenGL 4.4 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 12 GB
Memory bandwidth 153.6 GB/s 288.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 1200 MHz 6008 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore