AMD FirePro D700 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40m
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro D700 and NVIDIA Tesla K40m videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro D700
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 27% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 667 MHz
- Around 29% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 25131 vs 19542
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 74.325 vs 68.519
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.419 vs 6.358
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 January 2014 vs 22 November 2013 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 667 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 25131 vs 19542 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 74.325 vs 68.519 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.419 vs 6.358 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K40m
- Around 64% higher texture fill rate: 178.8 GTexel / s vs 108.8 GTexel / s
- Around 41% higher pipelines: 2880 vs 2048
- Around 23% better floating-point performance: 4,291 gflops vs 3,482 gflops
- Around 12% lower typical power consumption: 245 Watt vs 274 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 10% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5480 MHz
- Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1884.11 vs 1338.806
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.253 vs 91.354
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 178.8 GTexel / s vs 108.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2880 vs 2048 |
Floating-point performance | 4,291 gflops vs 3,482 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 245 Watt vs 274 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 6 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 5480 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1884.11 vs 1338.806 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.253 vs 91.354 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro D700
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K40m
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro D700 | NVIDIA Tesla K40m |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 25131 | 19542 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 74.325 | 68.519 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1338.806 | 1884.11 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.419 | 6.358 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.354 | 117.253 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6051 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6051 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 310.472 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 184 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3143 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro D700 | NVIDIA Tesla K40m | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Tahiti | GK110B |
Launch date | 18 January 2014 | 22 November 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 591 | 593 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $7,699 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 667 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,482 gflops | 4,291 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2880 |
Texture fill rate | 108.8 GTexel / s | 178.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 274 Watt | 245 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 7,080 million |
Boost clock speed | 745 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 279 mm | 267 mm |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 263.0 GB / s | 288.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5480 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |