NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40m
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P620 and NVIDIA Tesla K40m videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 90% higher core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 667 MHz
- Around 82% higher boost clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 745 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 6.1x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 245 Watt
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3658 vs 3143
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 544 vs 184
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 February 2018 vs 22 November 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1266 MHz vs 667 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1354 MHz vs 745 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 245 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3658 vs 3143 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 544 vs 184 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K40m
- 3.8x more texture fill rate: 178.8 GTexel / s vs 46.56 GTexel / s
- 5.6x more pipelines: 2880 vs 512
- 2.9x better floating-point performance: 4,291 gflops vs 1,490 gflops
- 6x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 57% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19542 vs 12475
- Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 68.519 vs 43.877
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1884.11 vs 773.248
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.358 vs 3.082
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.253 vs 53.425
- Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 310.472 vs 184.343
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 178.8 GTexel / s vs 46.56 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2880 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 4,291 gflops vs 1,490 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19542 vs 12475 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 68.519 vs 43.877 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1884.11 vs 773.248 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.358 vs 3.082 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.253 vs 53.425 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 310.472 vs 184.343 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P620
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K40m
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P620 | NVIDIA Tesla K40m |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3658 | 3143 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 544 | 184 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12475 | 19542 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.877 | 68.519 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 773.248 | 1884.11 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.082 | 6.358 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.425 | 117.253 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.343 | 310.472 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3575 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3575 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P620 | NVIDIA Tesla K40m | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
Code name | GP107 | GK110B |
Launch date | 1 February 2018 | 22 November 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 590 | 593 |
Price now | $176.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 25.53 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $7,699 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1354 MHz | 745 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1266 MHz | 667 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,490 gflops | 4,291 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 2880 |
Texture fill rate | 46.56 GTexel / s | 178.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 245 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 7,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.19 GB / s | 288.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |