NVIDIA Tesla M2070 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M2070 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2070
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- 2.5x more texture fill rate: 32.2 GTexel / s vs 13.0 billion / sec
- 4.7x more pipelines: 448 vs 96
- 3.3x better floating-point performance: 1,030.4 gflops vs 311.04 gflops
- 6x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB
- Around 96% higher memory clock speed: 3132 MHz vs 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3)
- Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.145 vs 6.139
- 5.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 910.236 vs 171.053
- Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.005 vs 0.65
- 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 46.235 vs 9.729
- 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 94.442 vs 19.871
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 July 2011 vs 1 February 2011 |
Texture fill rate | 32.2 GTexel / s vs 13.0 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 448 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops vs 311.04 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 3132 MHz vs 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3) |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.145 vs 6.139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 910.236 vs 171.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.005 vs 0.65 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 46.235 vs 9.729 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 94.442 vs 19.871 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 574 MHz
- 3.5x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 225 Watt
Core clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 574 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M2070
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla M2070 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.145 | 6.139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 910.236 | 171.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.005 | 0.65 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 46.235 | 9.729 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 94.442 | 19.871 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 775 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 233 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2625 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1208 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2053 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3275 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1208 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2053 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3275 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla M2070 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
Code name | GF100 | GF108 |
Launch date | 25 July 2011 | 1 February 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,099 | $79 |
Place in performance rating | 1336 | 1337 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Price now | $69.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 14.03 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 574 MHz | 1620 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | 311.04 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 448 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 32.2 GTexel / s | 13.0 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 585 million |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, HDMIVGADual Link DVI |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 248 mm | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB / s | 28.8 (DDR3) – 51.2 (GDDR5) |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3132 MHz | 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3) |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Standard memory config per GPU | 1 GB GDDR5 or 2 GB | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA |