NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs AMD Radeon HD 6770
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M2090 and AMD Radeon HD 6770 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2090
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 36.4 GTexel / s vs 34.0 GTexel / s
- 6x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 1 GB
- 3.5x more memory clock speed: 3700 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 3.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13075 vs 3802
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.87 vs 9.69
- Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1127.187 vs 615.217
- 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.833 vs 1.004
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 57.33 vs 26.748
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 119.136 vs 115.157
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 25 July 2011 vs 21 January 2011 |
| Texture fill rate | 36.4 GTexel / s vs 34.0 GTexel / s |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 3700 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13075 vs 3802 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.87 vs 9.69 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1127.187 vs 615.217 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.833 vs 1.004 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.33 vs 26.748 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 119.136 vs 115.157 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6770
- Around 56% higher pipelines: 800 vs 512
- Around 2% better floating-point performance: 1,360.0 gflops vs 1,331.2 gflops
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 108 Watt vs 250 Watt
| Pipelines | 800 vs 512 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,360.0 gflops vs 1,331.2 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 108 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M2090
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6770
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Tesla M2090 | AMD Radeon HD 6770 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13075 | 3802 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.87 | 9.69 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1127.187 | 615.217 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.833 | 1.004 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.33 | 26.748 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 119.136 | 115.157 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1255 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 317 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2546 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2279 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2546 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2279 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Tesla M2090 | AMD Radeon HD 6770 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | GF110 | Juniper |
| Launch date | 25 July 2011 | 21 January 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 1116 | 1117 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $129 | |
| Price now | $76.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 27.17 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,331.2 gflops | 1,360.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 800 |
| Texture fill rate | 36.4 GTexel / s | 34.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 108 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 1,040 million |
| Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 248 mm | 198 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 177.6 GB / s | 76.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3700 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Tesla M2090 with others
NVIDIATesla M2090 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 7900 GS
NVIDIATesla M2090 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7050 + nForce 630i
NVIDIATesla M2090 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6770
NVIDIATesla M2090 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2100M
NVIDIATesla M2090 vs
AMDRadeon R5 330 OEM
NVIDIATesla M2090 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M465
