NVIDIA Quadro K2100M vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2100M and NVIDIA Tesla M2090 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

NVIDIA Tesla M2090

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
Around 3% higher core clock speed: 667 MHz vs 650 MHz
Around 13% higher pipelines: 576 vs 512
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
4.5x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 250 Watt

Launch date	23 July 2013 vs 25 July 2011
Core clock speed	667 MHz vs 650 MHz
Pipelines	576 vs 512
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt vs 250 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2090

Around 14% higher texture fill rate: 36.4 GTexel / s vs 32.02 GTexel / s
Around 73% better floating-point performance: 1,331.2 gflops vs 768.4 gflops
3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
Around 23% higher memory clock speed: 3700 MHz vs 3008 MHz
2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13075 vs 4570
2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.87 vs 12.383
3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1127.187 vs 358.892
3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.833 vs 1.107
2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 57.33 vs 21.761
2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 119.136 vs 40.703

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	36.4 GTexel / s vs 32.02 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance	1,331.2 gflops vs 768.4 gflops
Maximum memory size	6 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	3700 MHz vs 3008 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	13075 vs 4570
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	33.87 vs 12.383
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1127.187 vs 358.892
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.833 vs 1.107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	57.33 vs 21.761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	119.136 vs 40.703

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M2090

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

4570

13075

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12.383

33.87

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

358.892

1127.187

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.107

3.833

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

21.761

57.33

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

40.703

119.136

Name	NVIDIA Quadro K2100M	NVIDIA Tesla M2090
PassMark - G3D Mark	1357
PassMark - G2D Mark	284
Geekbench - OpenCL	4570	13075
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	12.383	33.87
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	358.892	1127.187
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.107	3.833
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	21.761	57.33
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	40.703	119.136
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2294
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3605
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3362
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2294
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3605
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3362
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro K2100M	NVIDIA Tesla M2090
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi 2.0
Code name	GK106	GF110
Launch date	23 July 2013	25 July 2011
Launch price (MSRP)	$84.95
Place in performance rating	1115	1116
Price now	$159.99
Type	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Value for money (0-100)	10.91
Technical info
Core clock speed	667 MHz	650 MHz
Floating-point performance	768.4 gflops	1,331.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	576	512
Texture fill rate	32.02 GTexel / s	36.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt	250 Watt
Transistor count	2,540 million	3,000 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized
Length		248 mm
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Shader Model	5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	6 GB
Memory bandwidth	48.0 GB / s	177.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	3008 MHz	3700 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus