NVIDIA Tesla M40 vs AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M40 and AMD Radeon R4 Graphics videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M40
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 948 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 33.4x more texture fill rate: 213.9 GTexel / s vs 6.4 GTexel / s
- 24x more pipelines: 3072 vs 128
- 33.4x better floating-point performance: 6,844 gflops vs 204.8 gflops
- 4.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39184 vs 8386
- 4.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 437 vs 99
- 29.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10220 vs 342
- 38.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 183.81 vs 4.721
- 24.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2637.997 vs 107.613
- 29.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.059 vs 0.445
- 15.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 160.359 vs 10.612
- 52.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 688.388 vs 13.097
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 November 2015 vs 11 June 2014 |
Core clock speed | 948 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 213.9 GTexel / s vs 6.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 128 |
Floating-point performance | 6,844 gflops vs 204.8 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39184 vs 8386 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 437 vs 99 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10220 vs 342 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 183.81 vs 4.721 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2637.997 vs 107.613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.059 vs 0.445 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 160.359 vs 10.612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 688.388 vs 13.097 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
- 16.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 250 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M40
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla M40 | AMD Radeon R4 Graphics |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39184 | 8386 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 437 | 99 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10220 | 342 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 183.81 | 4.721 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2637.997 | 107.613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.059 | 0.445 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 160.359 | 10.612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 688.388 | 13.097 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 701 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1338 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1811 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 701 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1338 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1811 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla M40 | AMD Radeon R4 Graphics | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | GM200 | Beema |
Launch date | 10 November 2015 | 11 June 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 260 | 1540 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1114 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 948 MHz | 800 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 6,844 gflops | 204.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 3072 | 128 |
Texture fill rate | 213.9 GTexel / s | 6.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 8,000 million | 930 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |