NVIDIA Tesla M40 versus AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Tesla M40 and AMD Radeon R4 Graphics pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla M40
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 19% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 948 MHz versus 800 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 213.9 GTexel / s versus 6.4 GTexel / s
- 24x plus de pipelines: 3072 versus 128
- 33.4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 6,844 gflops versus 204.8 gflops
- 4.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 39184 versus 8386
- 4.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 437 versus 99
- 29.9x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 10220 versus 342
- 38.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 183.81 versus 4.721
- 24.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2637.997 versus 107.613
- 29.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.059 versus 0.445
- 15.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 160.359 versus 10.612
- 52.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 688.388 versus 13.097
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 10 November 2015 versus 11 June 2014 |
Vitesse du noyau | 948 MHz versus 800 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 213.9 GTexel / s versus 6.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3072 versus 128 |
Performance á point flottant | 6,844 gflops versus 204.8 gflops |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39184 versus 8386 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 437 versus 99 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10220 versus 342 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 183.81 versus 4.721 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2637.997 versus 107.613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.059 versus 0.445 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 160.359 versus 10.612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 688.388 versus 13.097 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
- 16.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 250 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M40
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Tesla M40 | AMD Radeon R4 Graphics |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39184 | 8386 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 437 | 99 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10220 | 342 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 183.81 | 4.721 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2637.997 | 107.613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.059 | 0.445 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 160.359 | 10.612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 688.388 | 13.097 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 701 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1338 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1811 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 701 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1338 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1811 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Tesla M40 | AMD Radeon R4 Graphics | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Nom de code | GM200 | Beema |
Date de sortie | 10 November 2015 | 11 June 2014 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 260 | 1540 |
Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1114 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 948 MHz | 800 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 6,844 gflops | 204.8 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 3072 | 128 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 213.9 GTexel / s | 6.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 15 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 8,000 million | 930 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
Longeur | 267 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 12 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 288.0 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | System Shared |