NVIDIA Tesla M40 vs NVIDIA GeForce 945M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M40 and NVIDIA GeForce 945M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M40
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1114 MHz vs 1085 MHz
- 7.2x more texture fill rate: 213.9 GTexel / s vs 29.81 GTexel / s
- 6x more pipelines: 3072 vs 512
- 7.2x better floating-point performance: 6,844 gflops vs 953.9 gflops
- 6x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 2 GB
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 4.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 37593 vs 8099
- Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 467 vs 255
- 4.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10183 vs 2108
- 6.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 183.81 vs 28.633
- 6.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2637.997 vs 380.461
- 6.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.059 vs 1.988
- 5.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 160.359 vs 31.027
- 6.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 688.388 vs 107.094
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1114 MHz vs 1085 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 213.9 GTexel / s vs 29.81 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 6,844 gflops vs 953.9 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 37593 vs 8099 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 467 vs 255 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10183 vs 2108 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 183.81 vs 28.633 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2637.997 vs 380.461 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.059 vs 1.988 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 160.359 vs 31.027 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 688.388 vs 107.094 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 945M
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 948 MHz
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 948 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M40
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 945M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla M40 | NVIDIA GeForce 945M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 37593 | 8099 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 467 | 255 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10183 | 2108 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 183.81 | 28.633 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2637.997 | 380.461 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.059 | 1.988 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 160.359 | 31.027 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 688.388 | 107.094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2961 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2961 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla M40 | NVIDIA GeForce 945M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | GM200 | GM107 |
Launch date | 10 November 2015 | 27 October 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 249 | 952 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1114 MHz | 1085 MHz |
Core clock speed | 948 MHz | 1029 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 6,844 gflops | 953.9 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 3072 | 512 |
Texture fill rate | 213.9 GTexel / s | 29.81 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 8,000 million | 1,870 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB / s | 16.02 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |