NVIDIA Tesla M40 versus NVIDIA GeForce 945M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Tesla M40 and NVIDIA GeForce 945M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla M40
- Environ 3% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1114 MHz versus 1085 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 213.9 GTexel / s versus 29.81 GTexel / s
- 6x plus de pipelines: 3072 versus 512
- 7.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 6,844 gflops versus 953.9 gflops
- 6x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 12 GB versus 2 GB
- 3.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- 4.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 37593 versus 8099
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 467 versus 243
- 4.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 10183 versus 2106
- 6.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 183.81 versus 28.633
- 6.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2637.997 versus 380.461
- 6.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.059 versus 1.988
- 5.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 160.359 versus 31.027
- 6.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 688.388 versus 107.094
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 1114 MHz versus 1085 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 213.9 GTexel / s versus 29.81 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3072 versus 512 |
Performance á point flottant | 6,844 gflops versus 953.9 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 37593 versus 8099 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 467 versus 243 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10183 versus 2106 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 183.81 versus 28.633 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2637.997 versus 380.461 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.059 versus 1.988 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 160.359 versus 31.027 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 688.388 versus 107.094 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 945M
- Environ 9% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1029 MHz versus 948 MHz
- 3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 250 Watt
Vitesse du noyau | 1029 MHz versus 948 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M40
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 945M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Tesla M40 | NVIDIA GeForce 945M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 37593 | 8099 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 467 | 243 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10183 | 2106 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 183.81 | 28.633 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2637.997 | 380.461 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.059 | 1.988 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 160.359 | 31.027 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 688.388 | 107.094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2961 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2961 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Tesla M40 | NVIDIA GeForce 945M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell |
Nom de code | GM200 | GM107 |
Date de sortie | 10 November 2015 | 27 October 2015 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 249 | 961 |
Genre | Workstation | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1114 MHz | 1085 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 948 MHz | 1029 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 6,844 gflops | 953.9 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 3072 | 512 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 213.9 GTexel / s | 29.81 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 75 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 8,000 million | 1,870 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Longeur | 267 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 12 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 288.0 GB / s | 16.02 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |