NVIDIA Tesla M40 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M40 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M40
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 948 MHz vs 384
- 5.8x more texture fill rate: 213.9 GTexel / s vs 36.8 billion / sec
- 8x more pipelines: 3072 vs 384
- 7.7x better floating-point performance: 6,844 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 6x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 2 GB
- 4x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- 4.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10465 vs 2360
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 November 2015 vs 5 January 2011 |
Core clock speed | 948 MHz vs 384 |
Texture fill rate | 213.9 GTexel / s vs 36.8 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 6,844 gflops vs 883.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10465 vs 2360 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 479 vs 452
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 479 vs 452 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M40
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla M40 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39269 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 452 | 479 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10465 | 2360 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 183.81 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2637.997 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.059 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 160.359 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 688.388 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla M40 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | GM200 | GF104 |
Launch date | 10 November 2015 | 5 January 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 264 | 263 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1114 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 948 MHz | 384 |
Floating-point performance | 6,844 gflops | 883.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 3072 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 213.9 GTexel / s | 36.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 8,000 million | 1,950 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB / s | 96.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |