NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs NVIDIA Tesla M40
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti and NVIDIA Tesla M40 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 387.1x more texture fill rate: 82.80 GTexel/s vs 213.9 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 498 vs 452
- Around 47% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57745 vs 39179
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 229.393 vs 183.81
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.561 vs 13.059
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 May 2021 vs 10 November 2015 |
Texture fill rate | 82.80 GTexel/s vs 213.9 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 498 vs 452 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57745 vs 39179 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 229.393 vs 183.81 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.561 vs 13.059 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M40
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 948 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1114 MHz vs 1035 MHz
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2560
- 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
- 4x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10465 vs 10137
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2637.997 vs 2082.931
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 160.359 vs 134.68
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 688.388 vs 599.217
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 948 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1114 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 2560 |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10465 vs 10137 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2637.997 vs 2082.931 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 160.359 vs 134.68 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 688.388 vs 599.217 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M40
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | NVIDIA Tesla M40 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10137 | 10465 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 498 | 452 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57745 | 39179 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 229.393 | 183.81 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2082.931 | 2637.997 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.561 | 13.059 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 134.68 | 160.359 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 599.217 | 688.388 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5425 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | NVIDIA Tesla M40 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | GA106 | GM200 |
Launch date | 11 May 2021 | 10 November 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 264 | 265 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1035 MHz | 1114 MHz |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 948 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 82.80 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 3072 |
Pixel fill rate | 49.68 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 82.80 GTexel/s | 213.9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 12000 million | 8,000 million |
Floating-point performance | 6,844 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 288.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |