NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs NVIDIA Tesla M40

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti and NVIDIA Tesla M40 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
  • 387.1x more texture fill rate: 82.80 GTexel/s vs 213.9 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
  • 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 498 vs 452
  • Around 47% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57745 vs 39179
  • Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 229.393 vs 183.81
  • Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.561 vs 13.059
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 11 May 2021 vs 10 November 2015
Texture fill rate 82.80 GTexel/s vs 213.9 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 8 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 498 vs 452
Geekbench - OpenCL 57745 vs 39179
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 229.393 vs 183.81
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 16.561 vs 13.059

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M40

  • Around 29% higher core clock speed: 948 MHz vs 735 MHz
  • Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1114 MHz vs 1035 MHz
  • Around 20% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2560
  • 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
  • 4x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
  • Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10465 vs 10137
  • Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2637.997 vs 2082.931
  • Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 160.359 vs 134.68
  • Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 688.388 vs 599.217
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 948 MHz vs 735 MHz
Boost clock speed 1114 MHz vs 1035 MHz
Pipelines 3072 vs 2560
Maximum memory size 12 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed 6008 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 10465 vs 10137
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2637.997 vs 2082.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 160.359 vs 134.68
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 688.388 vs 599.217

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M40

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
10137
10465
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
498
452
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
57745
39179
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
229.393
183.81
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2082.931
2637.997
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
16.561
13.059
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
134.68
160.359
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
599.217
688.388
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti NVIDIA Tesla M40
PassMark - G3D Mark 10137 10465
PassMark - G2D Mark 498 452
Geekbench - OpenCL 57745 39179
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 229.393 183.81
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2082.931 2637.997
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 16.561 13.059
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 134.68 160.359
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 599.217 688.388
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 16098
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 16098
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 5425

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti NVIDIA Tesla M40

Essentials

Architecture Ampere Maxwell 2.0
Code name GA106 GM200
Launch date 11 May 2021 10 November 2015
Place in performance rating 264 265
Type Laptop Workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1035 MHz 1114 MHz
Core clock speed 735 MHz 948 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 8 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 82.80 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 5.299 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 5.299 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2560 3072
Pixel fill rate 49.68 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 82.80 GTexel/s 213.9 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 12000 million 8,000 million
Floating-point performance 6,844 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors Portable Device Dependent No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Form factor IGP
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 3.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.7
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 12 GB
Memory bandwidth 192.0 GB/s 288.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective 6008 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5