NVIDIA Tesla M60 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M60 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M60
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 1178 MHz vs 928 MHz
- 10.2x more texture fill rate: 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 210 billion / sec
- Around 42% higher pipelines: 2x 2048 vs 2880
- Around 81% better floating-point performance: 2x 4,833 gflops vs 5,345 gflops
- 5.3x more maximum memory size: 2x 8 GB vs 3 GB
- 716x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 114.389 vs 75.429
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.266 vs 6.854
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 70.038 vs 58.067
- Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 314.404 vs 182.11
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 August 2015 vs 7 November 2013 |
Boost clock speed | 1178 MHz vs 928 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 210 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2x 2048 vs 2880 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 4,833 gflops vs 5,345 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2x 8 GB vs 3 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 114.389 vs 75.429 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.266 vs 6.854 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 70.038 vs 58.067 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 314.404 vs 182.11 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
- Around 57% higher core clock speed: 875 MHz vs 557 MHz
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9517 vs 7927
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 635 vs 549
- Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 28211 vs 26889
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2001.15 vs 1451.124
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10021 vs 8663
- 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3699 vs 886
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3342 vs 1791
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10021 vs 8663
- 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3699 vs 886
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3342 vs 1791
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 875 MHz vs 557 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9517 vs 7927 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 635 vs 549 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 28211 vs 26889 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2001.15 vs 1451.124 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10021 vs 8663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 vs 886 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 vs 1791 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10021 vs 8663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 vs 886 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 vs 1791 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M60
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla M60 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7927 | 9517 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 | 635 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 26889 | 28211 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 114.389 | 75.429 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1451.124 | 2001.15 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.266 | 6.854 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 70.038 | 58.067 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 314.404 | 182.11 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8663 | 10021 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 886 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1791 | 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8663 | 10021 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 886 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1791 | 3342 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3342 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla M60 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GM204 | GK110B |
Launch date | 30 August 2015 | 7 November 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 466 | 397 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Price now | $749.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 14.80 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1178 MHz | 928 MHz |
Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 875 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2x 4,833 gflops | 5,345 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2x 2048 | 2880 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec | 210 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 7,080 million |
CUDA cores | 2880 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | One 8-pin and one 6-pin |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 8 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 160.4 GB / s | 336 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2x 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |