NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla M60

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile and NVIDIA Tesla M60 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 84% higher core clock speed: 1025 MHz vs 557 MHz
• 5.5x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 300 Watt
• Around 10% higher memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 5012 MHz
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 886
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 886
• Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 1791
• Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 1791

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M60

• 32.8x more texture fill rate: 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 65.6 GTexel / s
• 4x more pipelines: 2x 2048 vs 1024
• 4.6x better floating-point performance: 2x 4,833 gflops vs 2,099 gflops
• 4x more maximum memory size: 2x 8 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 513 vs 379
• Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7551 vs 4242
• Around 78% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 29175 vs 16429
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8663 vs 6337
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8663 vs 6337

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M60

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	379 513
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	4242 7551
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	16429 29175
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6337 8663
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6337 8663
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 886
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 886
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 1791
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 1791

Compare specifications (specs)