NVIDIA Tesla M60 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40m
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M60 and NVIDIA Tesla K40m videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M60
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 58% higher boost clock speed: 1178 MHz vs 745 MHz
- 12x more texture fill rate: 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 178.8 GTexel / s
- Around 42% higher pipelines: 2x 2048 vs 2880
- 2.3x better floating-point performance: 2x 4,833 gflops vs 4,291 gflops
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 2x 8 GB vs 12 GB
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7927 vs 3281
- 4.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 549 vs 111
- Around 44% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 26889 vs 18672
- Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 114.389 vs 68.519
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.266 vs 6.358
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 314.404 vs 310.472
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 August 2015 vs 22 November 2013 |
Boost clock speed | 1178 MHz vs 745 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 178.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 2048 vs 2880 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 4,833 gflops vs 4,291 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2x 8 GB vs 12 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7927 vs 3281 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 vs 111 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 26889 vs 18672 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 114.389 vs 68.519 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.266 vs 6.358 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 314.404 vs 310.472 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K40m
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 667 MHz vs 557 MHz
- Around 22% lower typical power consumption: 245 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1884.11 vs 1451.124
- Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.253 vs 70.038
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 667 MHz vs 557 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 245 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1884.11 vs 1451.124 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.253 vs 70.038 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M60
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K40m
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla M60 | NVIDIA Tesla K40m |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7927 | 3281 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 | 111 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 26889 | 18672 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 114.389 | 68.519 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1451.124 | 1884.11 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.266 | 6.358 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 70.038 | 117.253 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 314.404 | 310.472 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8663 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 886 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1791 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8663 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 886 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1791 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla M60 | NVIDIA Tesla K40m | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GM204 | GK110B |
Launch date | 30 August 2015 | 22 November 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 466 | 638 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $7,699 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1178 MHz | 745 MHz |
Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 667 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2x 4,833 gflops | 4,291 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2x 2048 | 2880 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec | 178.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 245 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 7,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 8 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 160.4 GB / s | 288.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2x 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |